|
Smirky Recommends
| |
Buy this item via this link at Amazon.com and 15% of the purchase price will be donated back to Smirking Chimp!
|
|
Boot Bush Countdown
| |
291 days, 12 hours, 41 minutes, 57 seconds until Inauguration Day 2005
|
|
Contribute!
|
Did we miss something? Go here to submit a news item or op-ed piece for inclusion on the home page.
|
|
Get The Smirking Chimp on your PDA
| |
Click here to add The Smirking Chimp to your AvantGo channels.
|
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently, 150 guest(s) and 62 member(s) that are online.
You are logged as jonesy.
|
 | | $5 a month is all we askSmirking Chimp is looking for a few good supporters. $5 a month is all we ask to help keep us on line. Click here, and thanks. |
|
| War & Terrorism |
'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes'
Posted on Friday, April 02 @ 09:49:06 EST
Whistleblower the White House wants to silence speaks to The Independent
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington, The Independent
A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says
she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11
September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's
plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.
She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".
Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session
with the commission's investigators providing information that was
circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting
that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists
were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to
silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the
rarely used "state secrets privilege".
She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave [the commission] details of
specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target
information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave
them everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not
hearsay. These are things that are documented. These things can be
established very easily."
She added: "There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used but not specifically about how they would be used
and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of
terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major
cities with skyscrapers."
The accusations from Mrs Edmonds, 33, a Turkish-American who speaks
Azerbaijani, Farsi, Turkish and English, will reignite the controversy
over whether the administration ignored warnings about al-Qa'ida. That
controversy was sparked most recently by Richard Clarke, a former
counter-terrorism official, who has accused the administration of
ignoring his warnings.
The issue what the administration knew and when
is central to the investigation by the 9/11 Commission, which has been
hearing testimony in public and private from government officials,
intelligence officials and secret sources. Earlier this week, the White
House made a U-turn when it said that Ms Rice would appear in public
before the commission to answer questions. Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick
Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session.
Mrs Edmonds, 33, says she gave her evidence to the commission in a
specially constructed "secure" room at its offices in Washington on 11
February. She was hired as a translator for the FBI's Washington field
office on 13 September 2001, just two days after the al-Qa'ida attacks.
Her job was to translate documents and recordings from FBI wire-taps.
She said said it was clear there was sufficient information during the
spring and summer of 2001 to indicate terrorists were planning an
attack. "Most of what I told the commission 90 per cent of it
related to the investigations that I was involved in or just from
working in the department. Two hundred translators side by side, you
get to see and hear a lot of other things as well."
"President Bush said they had no specific information about 11
September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September,"
she said. There was, however, general information about the use of
airplanes and that an attack was just months away.
To try to refute Mr Clarke's accusations, Ms Rice said the
administration did take steps to counter al-Qa'ida. But in an opinion
piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what
some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were
preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though
some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and
free US-held terrorists."
Mrs Edmonds said that by using the word "we", Ms Rice told an
"outrageous lie". She said: "Rice says 'we' not 'I'. That would include
all people from the FBI, the CIA and DIA [Defence Intelligence Agency].
I am saying that is impossible."
It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However,
some senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she
went public with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence
and corruption within the FBI's translation department.
© 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd
Reprinted from The Independent:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/
americas/story.jsp?story=507514
|
| |
|
| "'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes'" | Configure | 68 comments | |
|
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by sparklingblu on Saturday, April 03 @ 10:27:10 EST (User Info) | | Does anyone know if this woman is going to appear before the 9/11 commision. That would put it upfront in the public's eye. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by Reich on Saturday, April 03 @ 09:42:53 EST (User Info) | | All
interesting comments. So what's the latest: 4 US soldiers killed and
defiled in the streets of Iraq and reports on terrorists targeting US
trains and buses. Are you more secure now than you were before 9-11?
Does it seem as if the Iraq war has stirred up more of a hornet's nest
and that most of Iraq resents seeing US occupation? I think we know the
answers to that. On a more personal note, due to a screw-up I made with
the lovely IRS because I cashed out a former companies 401k, I now have
to work two jobs, the second one being doing the telemarketing thing at
MBNA, which according to a NY times article, the president of the
company contributed $350,000 dollars to the Bush cam-pain, such that
Laura Bush showed up at the guys mansion to thank him personally. So
the irony for me is, a percentage of what I bring in, in sales goes to
an administration I comment on, in TheSmirkingChimp website, but for
financial reasons I can't leave it. I have been looking for other jobs,
but their aren't any. Oh, and the ATM in MBNA that I take my money out
of, DIEBOLD. I have become the enemy. The enemy is me. SIGH....... |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by yahoogy on Friday, April 02 @ 21:52:22 EST (User Info) | | I
see it all coming out,everything we have been saying here on S.C. has
been coming to light ,it just takes a few months in most cases,Its all
coming out,and you know why?,because the military itself is against
this Iraq invasion..I mean the families,Its all coming out...The last
piece of the puzzel is for Sen. kerry to select Gen. Clark as running
mate...then watch the truth unfold! |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by yahoogy on Friday, April 02 @ 21:50:41 EST (User Info) | "state secrets privilege".
WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!
WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!
WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!! |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by sonofawwIIvet on Friday, April 02 @ 20:25:27 EST (User Info) | Whoa,
Nelly. I've seen some comments written before on other stuff, but this
list of comments takes the cake. Go democracy! Let's hope that the
internet can be for John K. what radio was for FDR and what television
was for the other JFK.
Does anyone know what time of the day Condi is scheduled to testify on
Thursday, 4/8 and will be aired? You know the WH is going to try to
stuff it like at 7:30 am or make it happen during the "final four." |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by bythepeople on Friday, April 02 @ 19:26:49 EST (User Info) | Man,
if we could find another person of conscience to come forward and back
this couragous lady's allegations, that would be quite a huge nail in
the coffin. And we should donate $ to hire her bodyguards enough
bodyguards.
Someone help me out here. Yea, this election could already be in the
bag. But if that is the case, why are they still taking chances on
manipulating economic numbers? Why such blatent lies in their campaign
ads? Why such ferocious attacks on Clarke? Doesn't that make them look
like they have something to hide? Why put themselves at more risk? Just
lay low till Nov and when the fix is in and they win, they can say
again "get over it."
This agent and Clarke give me hope that they will be exposed, but is
that hope justified, or am I being naieve? I just can't believe the
house of cards these criminals have built will not fall in on them.
Anyone? |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by Perky on Friday, April 02 @ 18:25:29 EST (User Info) | | As
I said from the very beginning. The one person in the whole world who
benefited most from 9/11 was George W. Bush. For this reason alone, one
might conclude he wanted this to happen. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by jbmurf on Friday, April 02 @ 18:00:33 EST (User Info) | You
can check out a book in the library w/o another human present for miles
around, and yes, you’ll walk away with a paper receipt. Of course this
is all automated, insert debit card, scan book and boda-bing ya go!
Diebolt (sp?) proprietary code my ass. You’re a bean counter at best!
I wrote a state rep (6-8 months ago) and stated the whole non-paper
trail crap was exactly that, crap! I got the standard form letter reply
stating that if that does become an issue she would surely look into
it. Yeah right, thanks a lot ya pugin-fuck!
What in the hell do you mean, if, when or? OR? Or what?
I am an American but have been out of the country since mid ’99, and
I’m truly hesitant on returning for a visit until after the ’04
election. Of course the election could be a determining factor in said
visit. BTW, anyone needing short-term shelter can shoot me an email,
heheee. Really though, this is all so truly maddening! er, really, I
mean I will do what the POTUS won’t. I will give refuse to the
disenfranchised. (in SEA, temporary of course.)
I don’t know but I could swear that I saw “officials” dudes in suites
dickin’ round with model buildings and aeroplanes doing 911
simulations. History Channel, Discovery, CNN? Anybody remember that? |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by TCall2002 on Friday, April 02 @ 15:58:27 EST (User Info) | No
one will ever convince that the Halliburton White House was behind 9/11
- that's the reason why they don't want to find bin Laden.
Hey, they had to make Chimpy look presidential -- what did it matter if thousands of innocent people died?
Anyone who would steal a presidential election are capable of anything. These are truly evil, ruthless people. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by grammarcop on Friday, April 02 @ 15:33:58 EST (User Info) | in
an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote:
"Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that
terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as
missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack
planes to try and free US-held terrorists."
Wait a second... I thought I read that Condi asked to amend her private
testimony to the 9-11 commission to retract her "who'da thunk"
statements about planes as missiles. Is the phrase "attack the
homeland" the loophole now? It seems to me that in the past we have
heard the Bushies more or less acknowledge they knew something was
cooking but "we all thought it was going to be a strike overseas." I
wish they would just come out and say, "We need to qualify our earlier
weasel words." |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by ChimpChips on Friday, April 02 @ 15:31:24 EST (User Info) http://www.celebsoncels.com | Two tinnie tiny points I gleamed from this article.
Andrew Buncombe wrote:
""President Bush said they had no specific information about 11
September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September,"
she said."
As long as the u.s. of asses executive branch is allowed to keep parroting September 11,
2001 they are on "safe" ground 'cause NO ONE knew the EXACT date when
any attack would or would not {for the fans of olde rummie} take place.
Chicanery at its finest.
"But in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms
Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no
intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland
using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that
terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."".
What is with this homeland shit ?
99% of Americans when referring to their town, city or state will use
home..... however when referring to America as a whole they will use
America, the U.S., my nation or my country but rarely, if ever, will
they use homeland.
But why quibble about semantics when fascism is alive, well and growing in the homeland, eh.
ChimpChips {where is N.Chomsky when we need him ?}
|
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by FightTheFuture on Friday, April 02 @ 15:29:30 EST (User Info) | I
wonder how Ted Olsen feels about loosing his wife on the aircraft that
hit the Pentagon. Knowing that these pricks, like Ass-crack, knew
damming specifics of what was coming.
Of course, if he is a sociopath like most of that crew, then he doesn't (feel or care). |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by spinynorman on Friday, April 02 @ 14:48:26 EST (User Info) | | Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session.
Hehe! :) |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by Pax on Friday, April 02 @ 13:52:44 EST (User Info) | | With
all the evidence and informants out there, there is a Pulitzer just
waiting for some enterprising journalist/journalists for whom truth is
more important than the party line. |
[ Reply ]
Dommael rubs his Blarney Stone (Score: 1) by Dommael (Dommael@theGate.com) on Friday, April 02 @ 13:41:56 EST (User Info) | The one theme you get over and over on blogs, (especially this one that has a mix of American & European posters) is:
"When is the American public going to wake up?!?"
I've been doing some thinking on that. That concept not of
*individuals* becoming aware of the alarming abuse of government, but
of throngs of people unplugging from the lies and getting involved.
I took my girlfriend out to eat last night at a 50's style hamburger
joint. The walls were covered with laminated ads from the 50's and
while we ate we talked about this subject. The ads themselves were the
real thing, cut out of magazines and newspapers and saved, not modern
day lampooning of 50's culture. It was like going back in a time
machine.
The overwhelming theme I got from seeing all of these ads together was
the concept of the American Dream. It was repeated over and over and
over. It was very derogatory toward women (a Cornflakes ad had the
message to housewives "be good in the morning and you'll be taken out
at night ~ gawd DAMN!!!) and there were cars, sooo many pictures of
cars, even one ad of gaspumps being backlit by a glowing sunrise, as if
Jesus himself were blessing the petroleum company.
You know the typical 50's thing I'm talkin' about right?
Okay, so dig this ~ do you guys know who Bettie Page is? If you don't,
do a Google search on Bettie Page (*WARNING* This MAY get you in
trouble at work!)
Now think ~ why is Bettie Page still so popular? Because her image
flies in the face of that imaginary world of the 50's. It shouldn't. We
all know that the 50's Leave-it-to-Beaver, Ozzie and Harriet, American
Dream perfect-house, perfect-job, perfect-wife is a joke BUT it is
still the most accessible link (through the media) we have to the era
of the 50's. When we see images that reveal that there was a LOT more
sordid, squalid, negative things going on (I'm certainly not saying
dear Bettie is any of that, but)we still find it shocking even though
we KNOW it shouldn't be. Our minds have just been conditioned to accept
this American Dream as being largely the way it was, because it is
distorted so heavily through the media.
Back to today.
As the timeline stretches on it becomes increasingly evident where the
facts are regarding September 11th. Most people, yes even stupid
Americans, are capable of seeing that the "Conspiracy theories" have
more weight behind them than the "Official White House Version" of
events. Much to the aggravation of Chimpsters who have been collecting
facts for three years, people still largely reject the truth.
And that's exactly what's going on.
People's brains are REJECTING reality. To accept the "conspiracies"
means accepting right along with it some pretty hardcore truths about
our elected officials. That's what is going on. It's not a joke. If
people's perceptions of the decade of the 50's is still distorted so
many years later (pretty much as an accident) it's no great stretch to
realize that people have distorted views about 9-11 as a result of the
INTENTIONAL distortion by the media and the rulers in the government.
But you already know all that.
What you should realize though, is that there is a saturation point for
the human brain. Reality is creeping in exponentially at this point.
Your average American will realize the plot of a TV show in 5 minutes
because they've seen SOOO many TV shows in their lifetime. And the
Bu$h/Rove cabal doesn't have any new tricks we haven't already seen at
this point. People are waking up.
There will be a reckoning. Keep mocking authority. Keep questioning.
Raise awareness. Be informed. Make the politicians uncomfortable. It's
working. Bu$h, Cheney and the whole slimy bunch are smiling as the tide
washes over them. Eventually they WILL be swept out to sea and sent to
the bottom of the ocean with all the other shipwrecks.
~D |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by Chronic on Friday, April 02 @ 13:22:32 EST (User Info) | I
have been saying for months now. Jr knew that an attack was about to
happen thats why he took that all of the sudden 30 "working" vacation
in Texas.
THEY KNEW but they didn't tell the American people!
Remember 0n 9/11 when andy card whispered into jr's ear and the
expression jr gave? It wasn't WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON. It was : ITS
HAPPENING!
BUSH LIED THOUSANDS DIED! |
[ Reply ]- Chronic
by CitizenX on Friday, April 02 @ 14:22:12 EST
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by oahubob on Friday, April 02 @ 13:14:30 EST (User Info) | Ok,
now I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I'm not saying that this is in
ANY way true, but does anyone out there remember the short-lived
"X-Files" spin-off "The Lone Gunmen"?
The pilot episode's plot was the government remotely flying passenger
jets into the World Trade Center, which was narrowly averted by some
hacking by the heroes... (I actually forget the reason for it, but I
think it was as a cover to be able to establish martial law...)
All I'm saying is if some underpaid, caffeine-addled writes at Fox
(FOX!) can come up with this scenario, why not the security apparatus
of the US who heard inklings through the grapevine think it possible... |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by Chronic on Friday, April 02 @ 13:12:14 EST (User Info) | People we need to get the word out to everyone.
Call congress and the senate Democratic leaders. Demand they look into this.
Call CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC AND YES EVEN FOXNEWS. Ask them why aren't they covering this news story.
Anyone have info on how to obtain these numbers? |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by gadfly on Friday, April 02 @ 13:06:30 EST (User Info) http://www.igc.org/gadfly | Say hey, troops!
You are reading this, ergo you have a computer with internet access.
Type in www.democracynow.org . There you will find yesterday's program. The interview is listed there.
If you also have an audio player (and if not, you can get one free), you can see or listen to the Edmonds interview.
Tape it, pass it on, get it out there!
The Online Gadfly
www.crisispapers.org |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by CitizenX (ourantispam@netscape.net) on Friday, April 02 @ 13:04:33 EST (User Info) http://members.cox.net/hell_hole/ | This
along with all the other evidence (no investigation, no air defense
response, bush in texas for vacation for a month, bushes response when
he was told in the classroom) leads me to believe they knew some kind
of attack would happen and allowed it. I think they misjudged the
timing and the intensity. I would bet that the August 6th briefing
details his security requirements at that time and will show that they
had taken preparations (a month in texas) for his security.
On 9-11 I had the same thought. I DISMISSED IT OUT OF HAND. No matter
how jaded I am I wouldn't allow myself to sink that low to imagine our
government being in any way involved.
I no longer have a problem believing it. |
[ Reply ]- YES YES YES
by Chronic on Friday, April 02 @ 13:21:39 EST
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by A_makeover on Friday, April 02 @ 12:28:25 EST (User Info) | Wow! After reading this I rushed over to my TV to turn on the news.
After patiently sitting through and hearing about the tremendous job
growth, the latest on the Kobe Bryant case, Michael Jackson's upcoming
trial, the Laci-Connor bill just passed by Bush, and a relative of one
of the 4 slain Americans in Iraq talk about how he "died for
freedom"....then the local weather and traffic came on. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by yellowdawg on Friday, April 02 @ 12:26:55 EST (User Info) | | This
is almost 'too good to be true' - as sick as that may sound - in fact,
it wouldn't surprise me if she were a plant that will ultimately admit
that she was lying about all this in an effort to discredit bushco,
which, in turn, will diminish Clarke and any others that may come
forward. These guys will try any trick in the book to provide
'plausible deniability' for their actions. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by nemo on Friday, April 02 @ 12:22:51 EST (User Info) | I
believe that Ms. Edmonds is referring to Operation Bojinka...which was
discovered in 1995 in by Philipino police in Manilla. Which is proof
Ms. Rice is a incredibly bad liar.
Somebody get a fire extinguisher; her pants have spontaneously combusted... |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by smirkysmirk on Friday, April 02 @ 11:33:33 EST (User Info) | | I
can see not wanting to alarm the public, but come on, the airlines were
not put on alert about this? What the hell were these guys doing,
except making sure they themselves avoided commercial air travel?
Impeachment is the least these guys should face. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by sendbushtohell on Friday, April 02 @ 11:30:20 EST (User Info) | | There's
nothing to look at here, people. Move along. Get over it. Bush WILL win
in November and Diebold will see to it. 1 vote for Kerry will be 9
votes for Bush. The sheep & lemmings that follow Rupert Murdoch,
Hannity, Rush, et-al will dismiss this story as partisan politics. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by regular_joe3_0 (mad@monkey_boy) on Friday, April 02 @ 11:27:43 EST (User Info) | [I]n
an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote:
"Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that
terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as
missiles...
This is an obvious lie, but Condi will get away with it because the
Smirk administration will make dead certain that none of the documents
that prove otherwise will ever see the light of day. Yes, that includes
the e-mails that Clarke sent to Rice and all the information that the
Clinton people gave the Bushites when they took office. Afterwards,
Smirk, Cheney, Condi -- the lot of them -- were all too busy pursuing
their own, neo-con, cold war fantasies to "waste" time on the actual
Islamic terrorist threats.
Had Smirk not substituted his "faith-based" counter-terrorism
program for the real thing that the Clinton administration was using, I
doubt very seriously that 9/11 would have occurred.
But this is what happens when the will of the people is thwarted. It
all goes back to the stolen 2000 election. Things went terribly wrong
when the Extreme court decided to usurp the power of the people and
install the empty-headed puppet Smirk with a negative mandate. IMHO,
the 9/11 disasters are the predictable consequences of making an idiot
the POTUS.
As it turns out, being a "likable guy" doesn't qualify a person to be
president. The office of president is too important and too difficult
to be entrusted to an amoral, truth-challenged moron. We need somebody
in that job who can actually THINK and ACT, not just REACT. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by ImpeachCheney on Friday, April 02 @ 11:20:18 EST (User Info) | | Operation Northwoods II - except the sequel was better than the first for the Bushies. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by lastohioliberal on Friday, April 02 @ 11:00:40 EST (User Info) | | If
this holds up, it's the best evidence yet in support of the "Reichstag
Fire" hypothesis. I sure hope this hits the US press soon. Now we know
exactly why Ashcroft stopped flying on commercial jets - he had to have
seen these reports. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1) by Groverpm on Friday, April 02 @ 10:43:07 EST (User Info) | | It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. I don't care. I know she's telling the truth. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by dwbh on Friday, April 02 @ 10:28:27 EST (User Info) | | Too bad this will never, ever get reported in the mainstream media. |
[ Reply ]
Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1) by AnnaGranfors on Friday, April 02 @ 10:04:01 EST (User Info) | | ...and
if you want to see/hear more about this, go to democracynow.org and
scroll down to Wednesday's show or the Twin Towers icon on the right
side of the page. And, as Amy said on this morning's DN!, "pass it
on"... |
[ Reply ]
|