Fair
and
Balanced
The Smirking ChimpR.I.P.
Paul Wellstone
1944 - 2002.
Hello, jonesy | Logout
0 ChimpMail(s) waiting.
 
 
Smirking Chimp Featured Book
Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush by John W. Dean
Use this Amazon.com link to buy this book -- Smirking Chimp will receive a 15% commission.
 
 
The Latest
  • Latest Comments
  • Latest Members
  • Latest News
  • Latest Posts

  • Smirky Recommends
    Buy this item via this link at Amazon.com and 15% of the purchase price will be donated back to Smirking Chimp!

    Smirking Chimp Store
    Another way to donate: Buy stuff at The Smirking Chimp Store.

    Boot Bush Countdown
    291 days, 12 hours, 41 minutes, 57 seconds until Inauguration Day 2005

    Main Menu
  • Home
  • Activism
  • Smirky's Bookshelf
  • Donate
  • Downloads
  • FAQ
  • Links to the Left
  • Members List
  • Message Boards
  • Newsletters
  • News Feeds
  • Postcards
  • Recommend Us
  • Submit a New Story
  • Syndicate Our News
  • Top 10
  • Topics
  • Your Account

  • Smirky's Favorite Blogs
  • Atrios
  • Daily Kos
  • Great Divide
  • Interesting Times
  • skippy
  • Talking Points Memo
  • More blogs

    Essential Commentary
  • America Held Hostile
  • Barry Crimmins
  • Bartcop
  • Bear Left!
  • Crisis Papers
  • Media Whores Online
  • The Note
  • More commentary

    Contribute!
    Did we miss something? Go here to submit a news item or op-ed piece for inclusion on the home page.

    Get The Smirking Chimp on your PDA
    Click here to add The Smirking Chimp to your AvantGo channels.

    Goodies
    Send a Chimp-O-Gram virtual postcard

    Put our headlines on your web site

    Sign up for our Daily Chimp email digest

    Check out our Links To The Vast, Left-Wing Conspiracy

    Who's Online
    There are currently, 150 guest(s) and 62 member(s) that are online.

    You are logged as jonesy.

    Last Seen
  • jonesy: 0 seconds ago
  • 20lbsofcheese: 7 seconds ago
  • larebil: 11 seconds ago
  • jonh: 12 seconds ago
  • oh-fudge: 23 seconds ago
  • mmmmchemiweapons: 25 seconds ago
  • ShadowEyes: 28 seconds ago
  • sherimj: 30 seconds ago
  • morphiussep: 34 seconds ago
  • Simon_Jester: 37 seconds ago
  • artemiscAEsar: 43 seconds ago
  • dadaya3547: 49 seconds ago
  • bananaRepublic4chimp: 54 seconds ago
  • bleuet: 58 seconds ago
  • bythepeople: 1 minute ago
  • houyhnhnm: 1 minute ago
  • re: 1 minute ago
  • SuzieQ: 1 minute ago
  • cowmix: 2 minutes ago
  • ivana38: 2 minutes ago

  •   
    $5 a month is all we ask
    Smirking Chimp is looking for a few good supporters. $5 a month is all we ask to help keep us on line. Click here, and thanks.
     
    War & Terrorism
    War & Terrorism 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes'
    Posted on Friday, April 02 @ 09:49:06 EST
    Whistleblower the White House wants to silence speaks to The Independent

    By Andrew Buncombe in Washington, The Independent

    A former translator for the FBI with top-secret security clearance says she has provided information to the panel investigating the 11 September attacks which proves senior officials knew of al-Qa'ida's plans to attack the US with aircraft months before the strikes happened.

    She said the claim by the National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, that there was no such information was "an outrageous lie".

    Sibel Edmonds said she spent more than three hours in a closed session with the commission's investigators providing information that was circulating within the FBI in the spring and summer of 2001 suggesting that an attack using aircraft was just months away and the terrorists were in place. The Bush administration, meanwhile, has sought to silence her and has obtained a gagging order from a court by citing the rarely used "state secrets privilege".

    She told The Independent yesterday: "I gave [the commission] details of specific investigation files, the specific dates, specific target information, specific managers in charge of the investigation. I gave them everything so that they could go back and follow up. This is not hearsay. These are things that are documented. These things can be established very easily."



    She added: "There was general information about the time-frame, about methods to be used but not specifically about how they would be used and about people being in place and who was ordering these sorts of terror attacks. There were other cities that were mentioned. Major cities with skyscrapers."

    The accusations from Mrs Edmonds, 33, a Turkish-American who speaks Azerbaijani, Farsi, Turkish and English, will reignite the controversy over whether the administration ignored warnings about al-Qa'ida. That controversy was sparked most recently by Richard Clarke, a former counter-terrorism official, who has accused the administration of ignoring his warnings.

    The issue what the administration knew and when is central to the investigation by the 9/11 Commission, which has been hearing testimony in public and private from government officials, intelligence officials and secret sources. Earlier this week, the White House made a U-turn when it said that Ms Rice would appear in public before the commission to answer questions. Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session.

    Mrs Edmonds, 33, says she gave her evidence to the commission in a specially constructed "secure" room at its offices in Washington on 11 February. She was hired as a translator for the FBI's Washington field office on 13 September 2001, just two days after the al-Qa'ida attacks. Her job was to translate documents and recordings from FBI wire-taps.

    She said said it was clear there was sufficient information during the spring and summer of 2001 to indicate terrorists were planning an attack. "Most of what I told the commission 90 per cent of it related to the investigations that I was involved in or just from working in the department. Two hundred translators side by side, you get to see and hear a lot of other things as well."

    "President Bush said they had no specific information about 11 September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September," she said. There was, however, general information about the use of airplanes and that an attack was just months away.

    To try to refute Mr Clarke's accusations, Ms Rice said the administration did take steps to counter al-Qa'ida. But in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."

    Mrs Edmonds said that by using the word "we", Ms Rice told an "outrageous lie". She said: "Rice says 'we' not 'I'. That would include all people from the FBI, the CIA and DIA [Defence Intelligence Agency]. I am saying that is impossible."

    It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims. However, some senior US senators testified to her credibility in 2002 when she went public with separate allegations relating to alleged incompetence and corruption within the FBI's translation department.

    © 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd

    Reprinted from The Independent:
    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/
    americas/story.jsp?story=507514

     
    What do you think? Add your comment!

     
    Related Links
  • Search for more articles about War & Terrorism


    Most-read article about War & Terrorism:
    Dissenting voices not welcome in a flag-waving chorus across America


    Most-recent articles about War & Terrorism:

    Is America sending battle-weary, clinically stressed soldiers back into Iraq?
    Daniel N. Nelson: 'The smell of defeat hangs in the air'
    Nicole Colson: 'Bush's concentration camp: Tortured at Guantanamo Bay'
    'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes'
    Thousands of pages withheld: Bush aides block Clinton's papers from 9/11 panel


  • Comment on this article
  • Print this article
  • Email this article

  • "'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes'" | Configure | 68 comments
    Threshold
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by sparklingblu on Saturday, April 03 @ 10:27:10 EST
    (User Info)

    Does anyone know if this woman is going to appear before the 9/11 commision. That would put it upfront in the public's eye.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by Reich on Saturday, April 03 @ 09:42:53 EST
    (User Info)

    All interesting comments. So what's the latest: 4 US soldiers killed and defiled in the streets of Iraq and reports on terrorists targeting US trains and buses. Are you more secure now than you were before 9-11? Does it seem as if the Iraq war has stirred up more of a hornet's nest and that most of Iraq resents seeing US occupation? I think we know the answers to that. On a more personal note, due to a screw-up I made with the lovely IRS because I cashed out a former companies 401k, I now have to work two jobs, the second one being doing the telemarketing thing at MBNA, which according to a NY times article, the president of the company contributed $350,000 dollars to the Bush cam-pain, such that Laura Bush showed up at the guys mansion to thank him personally. So the irony for me is, a percentage of what I bring in, in sales goes to an administration I comment on, in TheSmirkingChimp website, but for financial reasons I can't leave it. I have been looking for other jobs, but their aren't any. Oh, and the ATM in MBNA that I take my money out of, DIEBOLD. I have become the enemy. The enemy is me. SIGH.......

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by yahoogy on Friday, April 02 @ 21:52:22 EST
    (User Info)

    I see it all coming out,everything we have been saying here on S.C. has been coming to light ,it just takes a few months in most cases,Its all coming out,and you know why?,because the military itself is against this Iraq invasion..I mean the families,Its all coming out...The last piece of the puzzel is for Sen. kerry to select Gen. Clark as running mate...then watch the truth unfold!

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by yahoogy on Friday, April 02 @ 21:50:41 EST
    (User Info)

    "state secrets privilege".
    WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!
    WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!
    WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by sonofawwIIvet on Friday, April 02 @ 20:25:27 EST
    (User Info)

    Whoa, Nelly. I've seen some comments written before on other stuff, but this list of comments takes the cake. Go democracy! Let's hope that the internet can be for John K. what radio was for FDR and what television was for the other JFK.
    Does anyone know what time of the day Condi is scheduled to testify on Thursday, 4/8 and will be aired? You know the WH is going to try to stuff it like at 7:30 am or make it happen during the "final four."

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by bythepeople on Friday, April 02 @ 19:26:49 EST
    (User Info)

    Man, if we could find another person of conscience to come forward and back this couragous lady's allegations, that would be quite a huge nail in the coffin. And we should donate $ to hire her bodyguards enough bodyguards.

    Someone help me out here. Yea, this election could already be in the bag. But if that is the case, why are they still taking chances on manipulating economic numbers? Why such blatent lies in their campaign ads? Why such ferocious attacks on Clarke? Doesn't that make them look like they have something to hide? Why put themselves at more risk? Just lay low till Nov and when the fix is in and they win, they can say again "get over it."

    This agent and Clarke give me hope that they will be exposed, but is that hope justified, or am I being naieve? I just can't believe the house of cards these criminals have built will not fall in on them. Anyone?

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by Perky on Friday, April 02 @ 18:25:29 EST
    (User Info)

    As I said from the very beginning. The one person in the whole world who benefited most from 9/11 was George W. Bush. For this reason alone, one might conclude he wanted this to happen.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by jbmurf on Friday, April 02 @ 18:00:33 EST
    (User Info)

    You can check out a book in the library w/o another human present for miles around, and yes, you’ll walk away with a paper receipt. Of course this is all automated, insert debit card, scan book and boda-bing ya go!

    Diebolt (sp?) proprietary code my ass. You’re a bean counter at best!

    I wrote a state rep (6-8 months ago) and stated the whole non-paper trail crap was exactly that, crap! I got the standard form letter reply stating that if that does become an issue she would surely look into it. Yeah right, thanks a lot ya pugin-fuck!

    What in the hell do you mean, if, when or? OR? Or what?

    I am an American but have been out of the country since mid ’99, and I’m truly hesitant on returning for a visit until after the ’04 election. Of course the election could be a determining factor in said visit. BTW, anyone needing short-term shelter can shoot me an email, heheee. Really though, this is all so truly maddening! er, really, I mean I will do what the POTUS won’t. I will give refuse to the disenfranchised. (in SEA, temporary of course.)

    I don’t know but I could swear that I saw “officials” dudes in suites dickin’ round with model buildings and aeroplanes doing 911 simulations. History Channel, Discovery, CNN? Anybody remember that?

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by TCall2002 on Friday, April 02 @ 15:58:27 EST
    (User Info)

    No one will ever convince that the Halliburton White House was behind 9/11 - that's the reason why they don't want to find bin Laden.

    Hey, they had to make Chimpy look presidential -- what did it matter if thousands of innocent people died?

    Anyone who would steal a presidential election are capable of anything. These are truly evil, ruthless people.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by grammarcop on Friday, April 02 @ 15:33:58 EST
    (User Info)

    in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."

    Wait a second... I thought I read that Condi asked to amend her private testimony to the 9-11 commission to retract her "who'da thunk" statements about planes as missiles. Is the phrase "attack the homeland" the loophole now? It seems to me that in the past we have heard the Bushies more or less acknowledge they knew something was cooking but "we all thought it was going to be a strike overseas." I wish they would just come out and say, "We need to qualify our earlier weasel words."

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by ChimpChips on Friday, April 02 @ 15:31:24 EST
    (User Info) http://www.celebsoncels.com

    Two tinnie tiny points I gleamed from this article.

    Andrew Buncombe wrote:

    ""President Bush said they had no specific information about 11 September and that is accurate but only because he said 11 September," she said."

    As long as the u.s. of asses executive branch is allowed to keep parroting September 11, 2001 they are on "safe" ground 'cause NO ONE knew the EXACT date when any attack would or would not {for the fans of olde rummie} take place.

    Chicanery at its finest.

    "But in an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles, though some analysts speculated that terrorists might hijack planes to try and free US-held terrorists."".

    What is with this homeland shit ?

    99% of Americans when referring to their town, city or state will use home..... however when referring to America as a whole they will use America, the U.S., my nation or my country but rarely, if ever, will they use homeland.

    But why quibble about semantics when fascism is alive, well and growing in the homeland, eh.

    ChimpChips {where is N.Chomsky when we need him ?}


    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by FightTheFuture on Friday, April 02 @ 15:29:30 EST
    (User Info)

    I wonder how Ted Olsen feels about loosing his wife on the aircraft that hit the Pentagon. Knowing that these pricks, like Ass-crack, knew damming specifics of what was coming.

    Of course, if he is a sociopath like most of that crew, then he doesn't (feel or care).

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by spinynorman on Friday, April 02 @ 14:48:26 EST
    (User Info)

    Mr Bush and his deputy, Dick Cheney, will also be questioned in a closed-door session. Hehe! :)

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by Pax on Friday, April 02 @ 13:52:44 EST
    (User Info)

    With all the evidence and informants out there, there is a Pulitzer just waiting for some enterprising journalist/journalists for whom truth is more important than the party line.

    [ Reply ]


    Dommael rubs his Blarney Stone (Score: 1)
    by Dommael (Dommael@theGate.com) on Friday, April 02 @ 13:41:56 EST
    (User Info)

    The one theme you get over and over on blogs, (especially this one that has a mix of American & European posters) is:

    "When is the American public going to wake up?!?"

    I've been doing some thinking on that. That concept not of *individuals* becoming aware of the alarming abuse of government, but of throngs of people unplugging from the lies and getting involved.

    I took my girlfriend out to eat last night at a 50's style hamburger joint. The walls were covered with laminated ads from the 50's and while we ate we talked about this subject. The ads themselves were the real thing, cut out of magazines and newspapers and saved, not modern day lampooning of 50's culture. It was like going back in a time machine.

    The overwhelming theme I got from seeing all of these ads together was the concept of the American Dream. It was repeated over and over and over. It was very derogatory toward women (a Cornflakes ad had the message to housewives "be good in the morning and you'll be taken out at night ~ gawd DAMN!!!) and there were cars, sooo many pictures of cars, even one ad of gaspumps being backlit by a glowing sunrise, as if Jesus himself were blessing the petroleum company.

    You know the typical 50's thing I'm talkin' about right?

    Okay, so dig this ~ do you guys know who Bettie Page is? If you don't, do a Google search on Bettie Page (*WARNING* This MAY get you in trouble at work!)

    Now think ~ why is Bettie Page still so popular? Because her image flies in the face of that imaginary world of the 50's. It shouldn't. We all know that the 50's Leave-it-to-Beaver, Ozzie and Harriet, American Dream perfect-house, perfect-job, perfect-wife is a joke BUT it is still the most accessible link (through the media) we have to the era of the 50's. When we see images that reveal that there was a LOT more sordid, squalid, negative things going on (I'm certainly not saying dear Bettie is any of that, but)we still find it shocking even though we KNOW it shouldn't be. Our minds have just been conditioned to accept this American Dream as being largely the way it was, because it is distorted so heavily through the media.

    Back to today.

    As the timeline stretches on it becomes increasingly evident where the facts are regarding September 11th. Most people, yes even stupid Americans, are capable of seeing that the "Conspiracy theories" have more weight behind them than the "Official White House Version" of events. Much to the aggravation of Chimpsters who have been collecting facts for three years, people still largely reject the truth.

    And that's exactly what's going on.

    People's brains are REJECTING reality. To accept the "conspiracies" means accepting right along with it some pretty hardcore truths about our elected officials. That's what is going on. It's not a joke. If people's perceptions of the decade of the 50's is still distorted so many years later (pretty much as an accident) it's no great stretch to realize that people have distorted views about 9-11 as a result of the INTENTIONAL distortion by the media and the rulers in the government.

    But you already know all that.

    What you should realize though, is that there is a saturation point for the human brain. Reality is creeping in exponentially at this point. Your average American will realize the plot of a TV show in 5 minutes because they've seen SOOO many TV shows in their lifetime. And the Bu$h/Rove cabal doesn't have any new tricks we haven't already seen at this point. People are waking up.

    There will be a reckoning. Keep mocking authority. Keep questioning. Raise awareness. Be informed. Make the politicians uncomfortable. It's working. Bu$h, Cheney and the whole slimy bunch are smiling as the tide washes over them. Eventually they WILL be swept out to sea and sent to the bottom of the ocean with all the other shipwrecks.

    ~D

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by Chronic on Friday, April 02 @ 13:22:32 EST
    (User Info)

    I have been saying for months now. Jr knew that an attack was about to happen thats why he took that all of the sudden 30 "working" vacation in Texas.

    THEY KNEW but they didn't tell the American people!

    Remember 0n 9/11 when andy card whispered into jr's ear and the expression jr gave? It wasn't WHAT THE F*CK IS GOING ON. It was : ITS HAPPENING!

    BUSH LIED THOUSANDS DIED!

    [ Reply ]

    • Chronic
      by CitizenX on Friday, April 02 @ 14:22:12 EST


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by oahubob on Friday, April 02 @ 13:14:30 EST
    (User Info)

    Ok, now I'm not a conspiracy theorist, and I'm not saying that this is in ANY way true, but does anyone out there remember the short-lived "X-Files" spin-off "The Lone Gunmen"?

    The pilot episode's plot was the government remotely flying passenger jets into the World Trade Center, which was narrowly averted by some hacking by the heroes... (I actually forget the reason for it, but I think it was as a cover to be able to establish martial law...)

    All I'm saying is if some underpaid, caffeine-addled writes at Fox (FOX!) can come up with this scenario, why not the security apparatus of the US who heard inklings through the grapevine think it possible...

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by Chronic on Friday, April 02 @ 13:12:14 EST
    (User Info)

    People we need to get the word out to everyone.

    Call congress and the senate Democratic leaders. Demand they look into this.

    Call CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC AND YES EVEN FOXNEWS. Ask them why aren't they covering this news story.

    Anyone have info on how to obtain these numbers?

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by gadfly on Friday, April 02 @ 13:06:30 EST
    (User Info) http://www.igc.org/gadfly

    Say hey, troops!

    You are reading this, ergo you have a computer with internet access.

    Type in www.democracynow.org . There you will find yesterday's program. The interview is listed there.

    If you also have an audio player (and if not, you can get one free), you can see or listen to the Edmonds interview.

    Tape it, pass it on, get it out there!

    The Online Gadfly
    www.crisispapers.org

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by CitizenX (ourantispam@netscape.net) on Friday, April 02 @ 13:04:33 EST
    (User Info) http://members.cox.net/hell_hole/

    This along with all the other evidence (no investigation, no air defense response, bush in texas for vacation for a month, bushes response when he was told in the classroom) leads me to believe they knew some kind of attack would happen and allowed it. I think they misjudged the timing and the intensity. I would bet that the August 6th briefing details his security requirements at that time and will show that they had taken preparations (a month in texas) for his security.

    On 9-11 I had the same thought. I DISMISSED IT OUT OF HAND. No matter how jaded I am I wouldn't allow myself to sink that low to imagine our government being in any way involved.

    I no longer have a problem believing it.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by A_makeover on Friday, April 02 @ 12:28:25 EST
    (User Info)

    Wow! After reading this I rushed over to my TV to turn on the news.

    After patiently sitting through and hearing about the tremendous job growth, the latest on the Kobe Bryant case, Michael Jackson's upcoming trial, the Laci-Connor bill just passed by Bush, and a relative of one of the 4 slain Americans in Iraq talk about how he "died for freedom"....then the local weather and traffic came on.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by yellowdawg on Friday, April 02 @ 12:26:55 EST
    (User Info)

    This is almost 'too good to be true' - as sick as that may sound - in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if she were a plant that will ultimately admit that she was lying about all this in an effort to discredit bushco, which, in turn, will diminish Clarke and any others that may come forward. These guys will try any trick in the book to provide 'plausible deniability' for their actions.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by nemo on Friday, April 02 @ 12:22:51 EST
    (User Info)

    I believe that Ms. Edmonds is referring to Operation Bojinka...which was discovered in 1995 in by Philipino police in Manilla. Which is proof Ms. Rice is a incredibly bad liar.

    Somebody get a fire extinguisher; her pants have spontaneously combusted...

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by smirkysmirk on Friday, April 02 @ 11:33:33 EST
    (User Info)

    I can see not wanting to alarm the public, but come on, the airlines were not put on alert about this? What the hell were these guys doing, except making sure they themselves avoided commercial air travel? Impeachment is the least these guys should face.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by sendbushtohell on Friday, April 02 @ 11:30:20 EST
    (User Info)

    There's nothing to look at here, people. Move along. Get over it. Bush WILL win in November and Diebold will see to it. 1 vote for Kerry will be 9 votes for Bush. The sheep & lemmings that follow Rupert Murdoch, Hannity, Rush, et-al will dismiss this story as partisan politics.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by regular_joe3_0 (mad@monkey_boy) on Friday, April 02 @ 11:27:43 EST
    (User Info)

    [I]n an opinion piece in The Washington Post on 22 March, Ms Rice wrote: "Despite what some have suggested, we received no intelligence that terrorists were preparing to attack the homeland using airplanes as missiles...

    This is an obvious lie, but Condi will get away with it because the Smirk administration will make dead certain that none of the documents that prove otherwise will ever see the light of day. Yes, that includes the e-mails that Clarke sent to Rice and all the information that the Clinton people gave the Bushites when they took office. Afterwards, Smirk, Cheney, Condi -- the lot of them -- were all too busy pursuing their own, neo-con, cold war fantasies to "waste" time on the actual Islamic terrorist threats.

    Had Smirk not substituted his "faith-based" counter-terrorism program for the real thing that the Clinton administration was using, I doubt very seriously that 9/11 would have occurred.

    But this is what happens when the will of the people is thwarted. It all goes back to the stolen 2000 election. Things went terribly wrong when the Extreme court decided to usurp the power of the people and install the empty-headed puppet Smirk with a negative mandate. IMHO, the 9/11 disasters are the predictable consequences of making an idiot the POTUS.

    As it turns out, being a "likable guy" doesn't qualify a person to be president. The office of president is too important and too difficult to be entrusted to an amoral, truth-challenged moron. We need somebody in that job who can actually THINK and ACT, not just REACT.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by ImpeachCheney on Friday, April 02 @ 11:20:18 EST
    (User Info)

    Operation Northwoods II - except the sequel was better than the first for the Bushies.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by lastohioliberal on Friday, April 02 @ 11:00:40 EST
    (User Info)

    If this holds up, it's the best evidence yet in support of the "Reichstag Fire" hypothesis. I sure hope this hits the US press soon. Now we know exactly why Ashcroft stopped flying on commercial jets - he had to have seen these reports.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack cities with airplanes' (Score: 1)
    by Groverpm on Friday, April 02 @ 10:43:07 EST
    (User Info)

    It is impossible at this stage to verify Mrs Edmonds' claims.

    I don't care. I know she's telling the truth.


    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by dwbh on Friday, April 02 @ 10:28:27 EST
    (User Info)

    Too bad this will never, ever get reported in the mainstream media.

    [ Reply ]


    Re: 'I saw papers that show US knew al Qaeda would attack ci (Score: 1)
    by AnnaGranfors on Friday, April 02 @ 10:04:01 EST
    (User Info)

    ...and if you want to see/hear more about this, go to democracynow.org and scroll down to Wednesday's show or the Twin Towers icon on the right side of the page. And, as Amy said on this morning's DN!, "pass it on"...

    [ Reply ]


    HomeDonate | Privacy Policy | Fair Use Notice | Web Rings | Contact Top of Page



    This web site was made with PHP-Nuke, a web portal system written in PHP. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our news using the file Backend.php or ultramode.txt
    Robot trap